Best CPU for gaming

Subscribe to PCGamesN on YouTube

If you just want the best gaming performance, you don't need to break the bank on a 16-core processor. With AMD dropping prices until December 2nd, 2017, there has never been a better time to replace your computer's brain with something a little younger and powerful. We've benchmarked all the latest processors to give you the low-down on whether Intel or AMD come out on top.

Check out the best CPU prices at Amazon US and Amazon UK.

That’s because gaming is still heavily reliant on single-threaded CPU power in terms of raw performance. Despite the dominance of quad-core CPUs, or above, in today’s gaming rigs the difficulty of coding for multi-core processors has meant we’re still not seeing many modern game engines taking full advantage of the powerful CPUs many of us have in our machines.

But that could be set to change with an increased number of dedicated DirectX 12 (and to a similar extent, Vulkan) games offering a more streamlined method for delivering all that processing power into the hands of gamers. It’s been a long, slow march, but processor power may soon become a vital component of gaming performance once more. Though I have been saying that for the last ten years...

We’ve already seen the green shoots of this revolution, however, with AMD's Ryzen 5 range and now Intel's recently released Coffee Lake CPUs delivering their first mainstream six-core processors ever. 

Click on the quick links below to jump to each specific section.

 

 

Best CPU for gaming

Best CPU for gaming - AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Cores: 6 | Threads: 12 | Base clock: 3.6GHz | Turbo: 4GHz | Socket: AM4

Approx. $200£189

The Ryzen 5 1600X is a fantastic processor. If Intel's Coffee Lake chips were available for an inoffensive price tag the excellent Core i5 8400 would still have the top spot, but AMD's six-core, 12-thread CPU is a better multi-threader and comes mighty close in the gaming performance too. And, y'know, they're actually available.

The 1600X is even more aggressively priced since those almost-vaporware Coffee Lake chips paper-launched and is able to boast a far more wallet-friendly platform too. But when it comes to straight gaming performance that i5 8400 does it beat. The historic gaming performance gap between Intel and AMD is  shrinking, with more and more titles launching built from the ground up for DirectX 12, but Intel does still have the lead.

If you do anything else with your PC as well as gaming - the sort of productivity shizzle which demands multi-threaded CPU performance - then the Ryzen, with twice as many active threads, is the better bet and more affordable than the K-series Coffee Lake.

The R5 1600X also makes the Ryzen 7 1800X look a little pointless for our gaming needs. The extra two cores of the much more expensive CPU don’t really offer anything else when it comes to gaming.

Read the full AMD Ryzen 5 1600X review.

The best AMD Ryzen 5 1600X prices we've found today:

If you can't see the price widget it's because your browser is running ad-blocking software. If you pause it you can check out the latest deals.

 

 

Best CPU for gaming runner-up

Best CPU for gaming - Intel Core i5 8400

Intel Core i5 8400

Cores: 6 | Threads: 6 | Base clock: 2.8GHz | Turbo: 4GHz | Socket: LGA 1151 v2

Approx. $200 / £189

Intel have almost wrestled back the title of best gaming CPU, but it’s not the Coffee Lake chip we were expecting. The Core i5 8400 is a straight six-core processor, so it doesn’t have the extra multi-threaded chops that the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X can boast. But that makes little difference when it comes to actual gaming performance. The problem is they launched in such limited supply - like all the Coffee Lake CPUs - that you still can't buy an i5 8400 for its proper retail price. Hence it being down-graded to its current runner-up status.

Because of Intel processors’ historic gaming prowess, even though the i5 8400 only runs at a pretty slack 3.8GHz when all cores are pushed to their limits, it’s still able to outpace the more expensive AMD 1600X where it counts. One of the most impressive things about this budget Core i5 is that it’s actually able to perform at the same level as the top Kaby Lake chip from the last generation, the Core i7 7700K. That was Intel’s most powerful mainstream CPU only ten months back.

Of course, if you need the extra multi-threaded performance of the Ryzen 5 hexcores for your productivity tasks - editing, rendering, streaming, etc. - then you’ve got the choice of either sticking with the more affordable AMD platform, or getting the extra Intel gaming performance with  the same CPU speeds, via an overclocked Core i5 8600K. For a purestrain gamer, however, the i5 8400 has got the goods.

The biggest issue for our favourite Intel Coffee Lake chip, aside from its ultra-limited availability, is the chipset you pair it with. Because it’s not a K-series processor it doesn’t need the extra overclocking goodness that the expensive Z370 motherboards provides, but unfortunately because Intel have launched Coffee Lake earlier than planned the more price conscious chipsets - the H370 and B360 - aren’t going to appear until the new year.

In the end, because Intel launched Coffee Lake early, there still isn’t a huge amount of stock around right now, so you'll have to wait to get your hands on Intel best 8th Gen CPU anyways…

Read the full Intel Core i5 8400 review.

 

 

Best CPU for gaming runner-up

Intel Core i5 8600K

Intel Core i5 8600K

Cores: 6 | Threads: 6 | Base clock: 3.6GHz | Turbo: 4.3GHz | Socket: LGA 1151 v2

Approx. $300£300

This is a bit of a surprise if I’m honest. I genuinely thought that, after what happened with previous Intel generations, the K-series Core i5 would be the go-to gaming CPU of this year. But because the Core i5 8400 is just so damned good when it comes to pure gaming performance, there’s almost no need to spend the extra on the Core i5 8600K.

Where the 8600K does have relevance is because of its overclocking chops. Running at a comfortable, stable 5.1GHz the Coffee Lake chip is capable of delivering the same level of multi-threaded CPU performance as the competing 12-thread Ryzen 5. To be honest, that seems to have been this processor’s raison d'être - beat Ryzen at all costs. 

But it’s more expensive than the 1600X, and you’re stuck with having to go for the pricey Z370 platform to get that overclocking speed. Well, and because you can’t buy the budget 300-series motherboards yet.

________________________________________________

 

 

Best high-end CPU for gaming

Intel Core i7 8700K

Intel Core i7 8700K

Cores: 6 | Threads: 12 | Base clock: 3.7GHz | Turbo: 4.7GHz | Socket: LGA 1151 v2

Approx. $415 / £408

The Coffee Lake K-series i7 is a cannibal. Not only has it eaten the Kaby Lake i7 whole, it’s also gone to town on both the hexcore i7 7800X and both the unashamedly irrelevant Kaby Lake-X parts. And those last three have only been around a matter of months. Brutal. But that’s what had to happen for Intel to get Coffee Lake out early and in the sort of shape that would give it the lead over AMD’s Ryzen.

This 12-threaded Core i7 8700K is the top Coffee Lake CPU of the moment and delivers multi-threaded performance which is pretty much on par with the top Ryzen 7 1800X chip, once you start getting down and dirty with the overclocking. We hit a happy 5.2GHz with our sample, and reports are you can push it even further.

But that’s just the boring productivity stuff, when it comes to gaming these 8th Gen CPUs knock AMD’s finest out of the park, cementing their place as the top gaming processors around. The struggle is that you get the same gaming prowess from the brilliant Core i5 8400, so you need to be sure you absolutely need the extra threaded performance otherwise you’d be wasting your cash… at least in the short term.

With more games being designed using DirectX 12 from the outset CPU performance will gain more relevance, but then we’ve been saying that for a while now… Still Intel has the gaming lead, and with the new six-core / 12-thread design they’ve also got high-speed mainstream CPU performance too.

Read the full Intel Core i7 8700K review.

 

 

Best high-end CPU for gaming runner-up

Best high-end CPU for gaming - Intel Core i7 7820X

Intel Core i7 7820X

Cores: 8 | Threads: 16 | Base clock: 3.6GHz | Turbo: 4.3GHz | Socket: LGA 2066

Approx. $500 / £530

The current top-end X-series processor, the Intel Core i9 7900X, is the most powerful CPU on the market, but that doesn’t make it the best high-end processor for gaming. The octacore i7 7820X delivers the same high level frame rates because of its speedy Intel cores running at 4.3GHz, and comes in at almost half the cost of the Core i9.

If you just wanted eight cores, then there are cheaper Ryzen chips that will deliver the productivity chops, but, for gaming, Intel still has the higher performance. The only issue with going for this i7 instead of the i9 is that you are taking a massive hit on the number of PCIe lanes. The 7820X has 28 compared with the 7900X’s 44 lanes of PCIe 3.0 connections.

So, the new Skylake-X series of CPUs from Intel are the most advanced processors available today. But it’s the ‘today’ part that’s arguably the most important part of that sentence, because the CPU market is in such a state of flux right now that there are high-powered processors just over the horizon. The two AMD Threadripper chips with 12 and 16-cores put serious pressure on Intel’s finest.

Right now, the Core i7 7820X would be our pick if you absolutely had to buy a new high-end CPU for gaming today, but honestly, this is not the time to be doing it.

The best Intel Core i7 7820X prices we’ve found today.

If you can't see the price widget it's because your browser is running ad-blocking software. If you pause it you can check out the latest deals.

 

 

Best high-end CPU for gaming runner-up

Best high-end CPU runner-up - AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

Cores: 8 | Threads: 16 | Base clock: 3.4GHz | Turbo: 3.8GHz | Socket: AM4

Approx.  $280£290

If you're not comfortable with running your brand new processor overclocked out of the box then the Ryzen 7 1700X is possibly a better option for you rather than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700. And chances are you're looking at the Ryzen processors because you're after their high core and thread counts for productivity tasks over and above gaming performance.

For general rendering and encoding you're going to want your chip to be as stable as possible and still run at a high clockspeed. The R7 1700 is a great choice if you're willing to overclock, but the safer option is this 'X' suffixed version of AMD's octa-core range.

In terms of gaming performance, you are leaving some of your GPU's potential frame rate in the box when pairing it with an AMD processor, at least you are for the time being. But with the multi-threaded performance on offer, at this price, if you're interested in using your PC for anything outside gaming this Ryzen is a great option.

Read the full AMD Ryzen 7 1700X review.

The best AMD Ryzen 7 1700X prices we've found today:

If you can't see the price widget it's because your browser is running ad-blocking software. If you pause it you can check out the latest deals.

 

 

Best high-end CPU for gaming runner-up

Best gaming CPU runner-up - AMD Ryzen 7 1700

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

Cores: 8 | Threads: 16 | Base clock: 3GHz | Turbo: 3.7GHz | Socket: AM4

Approx. $269£230

If you are happy with carrying out a little light overclocking on your new processor then the Ryzen 7 1700 is a great choice with a heady mix of fantastic eight-core pricing and still impressive number-crunching chops. At roughly the same price as Intel's quad-core i7 7700K the 1700 will be a rather tantalising prospect for anyone that isn't primarily going to be gaming on their PC.

By pushing the somewhat miserly stock clocks up to the same levels as the other Ryzen 7 chips you can get pretty much the same overall performance out of the 1700 for a lot less cash. It's still not a dedicated gaming chip, but it's got the multi-threaded performance that might make those lower frame rates more palatable .

Read the full AMD Ryzen 7 1700 review.

The best AMD Ryzen 7 1700 prices we've found today:

If you can't see the price widget it's because your browser is running ad-blocking software. If you pause it you can check out the latest deals.

________________________________________________

 

 

Best budget CPU for gaming

Best budget CPU for gaming - AMD Ryzen 3 1300X

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X

Cores: 4 | Threads: 4 | Base clock: 3.5GHz | Turbo: 3.7GHz | Socket: AM4

Approx: $100£110

I love budget kit. No, scratch that, I love budget kit that turns up offering the same sort of performance you would normally have to pay through the nose for. Loving your 2017 work, AMD. The new Ryzen 3 1300X is easily the best budget gaming chip around today, packing four overclockable Zen cores into a dual-core price tag.

It knocks the Pentium down into second place by virtue of the fact that we can no longer, in all good conscience, recommend anyone buy a new dual-core CPU when you a genuine quad-core core is within reach. Admittedly, the G4560 is a bargain price, but the Ryzen 3 1200 is only a little over $100 and still sports four cores, albeit with a slower clockspeed. Though you can get freaky with the overclocking fun with the Ryzen chip, not something you can say for the Kaby Lake Pentium.

The Ryzen 3 platform is excellent too. When you can pick up the overclockable 1300X and a powerful B350 motherboard, for the same price as a multiplier-locked Core i5 on its own, it becomes mighty hard to make a case for Intel. That pricing means you can build yourself a GTX 1060-powered Ryzen 3 gaming rig for the same price as you’d pay for a locked down Core i5 rig with just a GTX 1050 Ti. And you know which one’s going to be winning the benchmarking battle there, right?

The freakiest thing about all this is that if AMD manage to nail the Ryzen Threadripper release they could end up with a clean sweep of our best CPU picks. With the Ryzen 5 1600X taking the overall top spot, and the Ryzen 3 1300X nailing the budget market, a well-placed, 12-core 1920X could take over the high-end gaming CPU slot too. That would be a marked change from the start of the year where it was Intel or nothing.

Read the full AMD Ryzen 3 1300X review

The best AMD Ryzen 3 1300X prices we've found today:

If you can't see the price widget it's because your browser is running ad-blocking software. If you pause it you can check out the latest deals.

 

 

Best budget CPU for gaming runner-up

Best budget CPU - Intel Pentium G4560

Intel Pentium G4560

Cores: 2 | Threads: 4 | Base clock: 3.5GHz | Turbo: N/A | Socket: LGA 1151

Approx. $85 / £74

The Pentium G4560 is a decent budget CPU, offering Intel's 14nm Kaby Lake architecture for a sub-$100 price point, without too much of a performance difference between it and the irrelevantly expensive Core i3 7350K.

It doesn't have any overclocking potential and no Turbo clockspeed to boost that miserly 3.5GHz stock frequency, but it has Intel's Core architecture which will help get the most out of your GPU. The issue is that it's a dual-core CPU. It does have HyperThreading enabled, which is a definite bonus in this budget arena, but it's still at the bottom end of acceptable. In fact, with the two new Ryzen 3 CPUs arriving, buying a new dual-core CPU is arguably not acceptable if you hope to be able to keep using that chip a year or two down the line.

What it does have is an upgrade path for your platform, however. It uses the LGA  1151 socket, so with a suitable motherboard, such as an H270, you'll be able to drop a speedier i5, or even i7, processor into your board later on down the line.

The best Intel Pentium G4560 prices we've found today:

If you can't see the price widget it's because your browser is running ad-blocking software. If you pause it you can check out the latest deals.

________________________________________________

 

 

How to buy a processor

How to buy a processor

While picking the right graphics card is probably the most important choice for any gaming rig, selecting the right CPU for gaming can arguably have a greater impact on your system as a whole. By choosing a particular processor you are locking yourself into a specific company’s ecosystem and upgrade path, and you’re inevitably limited as to what motherboard chipsets are available to you too.

The price you’re willing to pay is still going to be the single biggest factor in picking your processor – pricing can jump quickly from one chip to the next. This isn’t like the GPU world where there's probably a graphics card available for whatever spare change you’ve got in your wallet at any given time; because there are only two companies making x86 processors to go into our gaming rigs there are few real options available at each price point.

The GPU will be where you want to spend the largest part of your rig budget, but it doesn’t pay to completely unbalance your machine. A cheap, quad-core AMD CPU isn’t going to let you get the most out of your GTX 1080; your two key components need to be better matched than that. Of course, if you’re Billy Big Budget then you can happily drop just shy of three grand on an i7 6950X with a new Titan Xp to keep it company, but if money’s a little tighter than that you need to play it a little smarter. 

AMD processors

Intel processor or AMD processor?

AMD and Intel took different paths with processor designs. Intel carried on resolutely working to get the most single-threaded performance it could out of one core while AMD bet the house on multi-threaded performance being the key to the future.

AMD lost. Particularly in gaming, where it’s still mostly a question of how much raw performance you can get out of your primary CPU core, and on that count, AMD’s processor design had been lacking compared with Intel’s Core architecture, meaning it was an Intel Core chip for gaming or nothing.

AMD had been the go-to guys for budget CPUs, though, since they’ve left their FX range of processors twisting in the wind for years without any meaningful update they’re looking increasingly irrelevant. You can still build a well-priced machine with an AMD processor, but the dead-end AM3+ platform gives your PC no room to grow and you’re going to be hobbling the performance of your GPU by hitching it to the last-gen AMD carthorse.

The new Ryzen CPUs have launched at the high-end, offering eight-core, 16-thread chips with insane multi-threaded performance for the money, but still pretty limited single-core – and therefore gaming – performance. That's thanks to their still off-the-pace IPC levels compared with Intel. We're hoping that further optimisations might be able to close the gap and give AMD's Ryzen chips a bit of a gaming boost.

Of course, if you've got the money for it, Intel's Core i9 CPU range (topping out at a frankly ridiculous 18 cores) and AMD's Ryzen Threadripper chips (coming in at 16 cores at the high end, but much cheaper) will raise the game if you need serious CPU power. Ryzen Threadripper offers outstanding performance for the price, but Intel tend to have AMD beat on single-threaded performance.

The prices for both red and blue team high-end silicon are (as expected) looking pretty nerve-wracking, so the normies among us will be looking to the cheaper CPUs for some time longer.

10 core Intel processor

More cores = more performance

How many cores do you need for a gaming machine? Realistically you can make do with a dual-core CPU so long as it’s HyperThreaded to offer four threads of processing power. But beyond four threads the returns quickly diminish, and in fact the difference between the Core i7 and Core i5 Skylake is utterly negligible. 

If you make the step beyond four physical cores though you will start to see a performance increase – the deca-core 6950X is able to offer incredible levels of gaming performance so long as you’ve got a powerful GPU strapped to it. That’s a crazily-priced CPU, however, but the six-core 6800K is only a little more expensive than either the 7700K or 6700K and can deliver genuinely tangible performance improvements.

But that's where AMD's Ryzen 5 1600X shows its true promise, however. It's priced in the same ballpark as Intel's resolutely quad-core Core i5 chips, but the Ryzen CPU is able to offer three times the thread-count thanks to its simultaneous multi-threading (SMT), and that can make a big difference most especially to the minimum frame rates.

That should only increase too as the promise of DirectX 12 and its core optimisations start to bear fruit. We’re still a little way away from celebrating proper multi-threading support in games, but thread count could become an important factor for gaming of the future.

The best chipset for your CPU

Overclocking and upgrading

To get the most out of your graphics card you need a good CPU, but to get the most out of that you need a decent motherboard. And your choice of motherboard holds the key to both what you’ll be able to do to push your processor to its limits and to your PC’s future upgrade path. You might appreciate a little advice from your favourite hardware prodders on how to overclock...

Intel offer multiple chipsets which offer compatibility for different processors. For Skylake, there’s the top-end Z270 chipset, followed by the more-mainstream H270 chipset. If you’ve no interest in overclocking, or high-speed memory, then the H-series motherboards will be fine, but if you want to squeeze a little extra out of your CPU then the Z270 is the go-to platform for your Intel processor. 

Not only will the Z170 or Z270 boards get you the highest overclock from a K-series processor, they will also give you a better chance of accessing baseclock overclocking for the locked down CPUs like the Core i3 6100.

There is the current line of 200-series Intel chipsets to accompany the Kaby Lake refresh which happened at the start of this year, but they're only really bringing support for the new Intel CPU line rather than anything particularly different in motherboard terms, a few extra PCIe lanes aside.

On the AMD side, the latest AM4 motherboards offer overclocking support in their X370, small form factor X300, and mainstream B350 chipsets. Ryzen also has a dedicated AMD application to help smooth out the rough edges of overclocking from the comfort of Windows. No more getting elbow deep into the BIOS then? Well, I think you'll still get better results getting familiar with the blocky text of your motherboard's BIOS, but so far the overclocking performance of Ryzen has been rather limited.

AMD made a lot of noise about the future-proofing of their AM4 boards. AMD have said that Ryzen is a four year architecture so that socket will cater for all their CPU refreshes for at least that long. And we're not just talking about straight processors either – AMD have unified their motherboard platforms so that both their CPUs and upcoming Zen-based APUs will operate using the same socket and chipsets. So it probably makes sense to spend a healthy chunk of cash on your AM4 motherboard as it's likely to be around for a while – according to AMD, at least. They are, however, introducing a new high-end socket for their upcoming Threadripper CPUs.

________________________________________________

Check Amazon for the latest deals and specs on CPUs.

Paladins
Sign in to Commentlogin to comment
0V3RKILL avatarStreetguru avatarEwok avatarDave James avatarelites2012 avatarsintheticreality avatar+8
0V3RKILL Avatar
294
1 Year ago

all AMD system here with an 8350 clocked at 4.5GHz, 16GB at 1600Hz on a MSI 970 Mobo with a 290x MSI twinfrozer clocked at 1040Hz. I happily play everything I've purchased at maxed in 1080p, exept GTA5. There I only have grass in high & reflection sharpening on 0X. I play Deus Ex at max with 40fps. Never goes lower than 35fps. Waiting for Zen at the moment. Got my money's worth out of this system I got to be honest.

5
Ewok Avatar
7
1 Year ago

5 years on and I'm still not feeling the need to upgrade from my 2500k. Still playing new releases 1080p on Ultra without a hiccup at stock settings - with plenty of overclocking potential if I ever need to.

5
sintheticreality Avatar
110
11 Months ago

I've had a 2500K for 4 years and unless Ryzen benchmarks are amazing and cost-effective, I'm not bothering to upgrade.

2
U take teethwash then take job Avatar
2

im in the same boat, I kinda pulled a weird move though. I bought a razer blade (late 2016, 1060gtx/6700hq.) and the core, slapped a 1080gtx FTW in it, and thought that I was going to slam my desktops performance to pieces. Well... I'm starting to wonder if I really did. UNFORTUNATELY, I can't think of a good way to test this.... any ideas?

2
Dave James Avatar
460
1 Year ago

It's interesting how long-lived Intel's CPUs have been using the Core architecture. If AMD had been more competitive over the last five years, or if game engines took advantage of faster CPUs, would their processor performance have stagnated so much?

My office machine has an old Ivy Bridge chip and have no need to upgrade it. Though there is a Skylake in the test rig for up to date benchmarking purposes...

1
Ransbear (Ranscat) Avatar
2
6 Months ago

I need to say that this list is mistaken in a few places. First, the 6800k is worse at gaming performance than ryzen 1600x, however intel 6700k is substantially better at gaming than the 1600x and i5 so the best high end gaming cpu should be the I7 6700k. Also the pentium G4560 achieves identical performance than the i3 for a much lower price.

In conclusion:

Best high end gaming cpu: I7 6700k

Best budget processor: Pentium G4560

Take into account this is considering gaming only, if you do video rendering, the 1600x is much better than the i7770k and 6800k.

2
Warlord Avatar
2
6 Months ago

At first, I wanted to disagree. Having done a little research, the G4560 is definitely within a few percentage points of the i3 at a lower price tag. Good call.

2
Streetguru Avatar
15
1 Year ago

Don't go AM3+ if you aren't getting an 8 core CPU, in addition you forgot about how the i7 6700 lets you get a more budget motherboard compared to an overclocking i5 + Z170 board

1
Dave James Avatar
460
1 Year ago

Personally I'd say just don't go AM3+ if you're buying fresh at all. It's a dead-end with new AMD chips coming in a few months.

And you're right about the budget boards; it's why I recommended the H170 as a decent option for those not looking to overclock their processors or needing high-performance memory.

1
Streetguru Avatar
15
1 Year ago

AM4 is taking far too long, but I think as far as new parts go an FX 8300 + ASrock 970A board that has USB 3.1 is pretty cheap for pure multi-threaded performance, or it's alright for certain kinds of servers

1
elites2012 Avatar
2
1 Year ago

intel R & D along with their convincing payouts, have lot more than AMD has. whats the point of a multi core cpu, when all you do is boost a single core to do all the work. why not go back to a single core and clock it to 5ghz or higher?

1
Danteska Avatar
6
11 Months ago

Why FX 6300 over 6350 and over 8350?

1
Dave James Avatar
460
11 Months ago

In terms of a budget CPU option the FX 6300 is a fair chunk cheaper than either the 6350 or 8350, and still offers a similar level of performance. The FX 6300 can also overclock like a hero if you want to squeeze some more performance out of it.

1
Tenshinai Avatar
2
10 Months ago

Written about the 6800K:

"and is arguably the best-value six-core CPU ever made"

Hardly, the AMD Thuban CPUs were awesome for its day, far beyond current Intel hexacores, and my friend is still running his 1090T, he has talked about upgrading for 2 years now, but because it keeps on being still "good enough", he´s now waiting for Ryzen before he decides. And that is despite his system being cheapskate to the point where he can no longer run with the turbo activated(both PSU and cooler was saved on heavily, against my strong advise not to, hehe).

1
Dave James Avatar
460
10 Months ago

I did say it was arguable ;)

But yeah, I loved the old 1090T! If AMD had kept on shrinking the Hammer architecture instead of shifting to the abortive Bulldozer designs they'd have a better shot at single-threaded performance. Still, roll on Ryzen, eh?

Anyways, back to the point, with the HyperThreading on the 6800K, and the quad-channel memory support, it delivers 12 threads of workstation performance for a great price. The 1090T was around $400 at launch too, so there's not a huge difference in that regard.

1
Tenshinai Avatar
2
10 Months ago

Oh, and BTW, you only talk about cores and threads in the article?

Some games totally adore having more or better cache, it´s the primary reason i went for a 4790K instead of 4690K, as Starcraft 2 get´s a noticeable improvement even when turning off hyperthreading and running those two at same clockrate.

1
Min64 Avatar
14
7 Months ago

I'm using a i3 6100 with a MSI GTX 1060 3gb for a budget system it basically plays anything i want at high or max settings at 1080p. Couldnt be happier.

1
team_pentium Avatar
5
6 Months ago

My specs:

• i5-6400 @ 3.2 GHz

• GTX 750

• Intel H110 Chipset

• 400W PSU

• and a lot of old crap hooked up with USB ports

1
Monsoon.Moon Avatar
7
4 Months ago

My Ryzen 1600x arrived on the weekend, all the other bits today, just waiting for my CPU cooler to arrive and I'll be putting it together, I can't wait.

1