IL-2 and Rise of Flight producer on making modern flight sims | PCGamesN

IL-2 and Rise of Flight producer on making modern flight sims

A trio of ungainly four-engine World War 1 bombers fly through the clouds.

Flight sims aren’t what they used to be.

In the hobby’s infancy, flight sims were one of the major genres, and even legendary designers like Sid Meier worked on air combat games. Games like Jane’s Longbow and the mighty Flight Simulator series were mainstream hits.

The landscape has changed dramatically since those days, however, and the time when flight sim fans could look forward to a few major releases every year are long gone. The Falcon series, Jane’s, Red Baron, and most of the others have been permanently grounded.

Succeeding in flight sims today requires a new, more supple approach, according to 777 Studios’ producer Jason Williams. With a smaller market, but with potentially revolutionary technologies like Oculus Rift on the horizon, the name of the game is accessibility without compromise.

Flight sims aren’t what they used to be. They’ve changed with PC gaming. And now they’re both about to change again.

777 Studios made their name with Rise of Flight, one of the best World War 1 flight sims since Red Baron and Dawn Patrol. Now, they’re working with 1C on two new sims.

The big name is IL-2: Battle of Stalingrad, the follow-up to the classic IL-2: Sturmovik. The other game is called Ilya Muromets, after the first heavy bomber ever made, which was created and used extensively by Imperial Russia during the First World War.

While IL-2 is something of a departure for 777, Ilya Muromets is very much in their old Rise of Flight wheelhouse. The war it models, however, is a very different one. In addition to a bunch of rarely-modeled Russian aircraft and the eponymous Ilya Muromets bomber, Ilya Muromets takes place on a front without long trench lines. More importantly, the Muromets’ bombing capabilities actually give it an operational role that aircraft never achieved on the western front, where they were limited more to tactical raiding, air support, and recon.

But it’s not the game design and flight models that preoccupy Jason Williams and the 777 / 1C development teams. They know they can make a great flight sim together, and they’re working with a proven quantity in the Rise of Flight engine. No, the real challenge for this next generation of flight sims is to lower the barriers that chase people away from even giving the genre a chance.

That’s why they’re committing what some hardcore flight sim fans might consider sacrilege. They’re making sure their games are as good with a mouse and keyboard as they are with a flight stick.

“We felt that this was an investment for the future. Because a lot of other games have mouse control of airplanes now. As much as the hardocore folks like us don't necessarily enjoy that, we know that there's a market for it,” Williams said.


Lite sims

Williams is keenly aware of the popularity of games like War Thunder and World of Warplanes. War Thunder is of particular interest to him. He returned to it several times during our interview.

It’s not surprising: World of Warplanes is basically a pure arcade game, but War Thunder is recognizably a kind of flight sim. Williams referred to it as “more of an arcade game”, but it’s far closer to Rise of Flight than it is to World of Warplanes. Somehow, it manages to feel authentic and intuitive even when players are using a mouse.

That’s a slightly taller order for 777 and 1C.

“If you go fly an arcade style game, and they have mouse control, the performance envelope for each plane is essentially the same,” Williams said.

But flight sims like IL-2 and Ilya Muromets are all about the character and idiosyncrasies of different aircraft. You can’t tune the controls for a bunch of small performance variations on a single theme.

“Our planes all have unique characteristics thanks to the flight modeling, which is very advanced. So you'll need to watch out for those characteristics, even if you're playing with a mouse.

A group of World War 1 fighters viewed from the front during a patrol, in a line astern formation.

“We want to be the first to give potential customers the opportunity to fly a hardcore sim with the same physics, the same ballistics, the same flight envelope, the same everything that you would get with a joystick,” Williams continued. “And then, if you fly multiplayer and you encounter somebody that has a stick, you can at least be a competitive player. We're not trying to simplify our gameplay, we're just trying to give another control option.”

It might be a bitter pill to swallow for purists, but it’s a reality to which 1C and 777 are adopting. The success of War Thunder and Warplanes is far too great to ignore, and most PC gamers don’t own flight sticks anymore.

“A lot people who might be interested go, ‘Oh, flying with a joystick? Never mind. I don't want to spend $50 - $100’ on a joystick.”


Fashionably late

That’s probably the biggest difference between the market of today and and the market that gave us what Williams calls the Golden Age of Flight Sims: the 1990s, and early 20002s. Not only did most PC gamers already own a joystick, but they were used to stretching their hardware (and their budget) to play the latest and greatest.

“There's probably no sim that offered a state of the art — for its day — high fidelity flight sim experience that did not have trouble reaching 60 FPS.” Williams said. “One of the genres that would push your PC and want you to buy a PC the next year were flight sims.”

But that’s not really the PC gaming market anymore. It’s become much more accessible overall, and encompasses people running a broader range of hardware. Where sims used to be able to boast about how they would bring your PC to its knees, and sim pilots would deal with jerky framerates in exchange for beautiful ground textures and better models, people want smooth performance without needing to upgrade. That’s caused 777 to become a slow — perhaps frustratingly slow — adopter of modern graphics standards.

A German and Soviet fighter duel at close quarters on a clear midwinter day.

“People criticize us because we have not adopted DX11. We never fiddled with DX10. We stuck to DX9,” Williams admitted. “We could amp up the eye candy even further if we really wanted to. ...But we can't do that without negatively impacting the gamers' experience. We don't want to make it so that only people with a 3k dollar computer can play our game.”

Williams seems to be ruling out the kind of graphical scaling performance that a lot of other developers employ to support new hardware while remaining accessible. On the other hand, as Williams is at pains to remind people that flight sim development is not really comparable to mainstream games.

“You have all these awesome engines that you can purchase or get your hands on to make an awesome shooter, and those engines typically have a lot of middleware that you can utilize to solve some of your computing issues,” he pointed out. “Like the physics, or the graphics. There's third party help to get you from conception to a finished product.

“Every single flight sim that's ever been made has essentially been made with a custom game engine. And the engine has to do the graphics, the physics, the ballistics, the damage model, everything. And it usually has to do it on a very large scale. Like we have in Stalingrad: 48,000 square miles. Or in Rise of Flight, we model the Western Front from Switzerland all the way up to Belgium.”


Waiting on VR

This is not to say that Williams and his colleagues are trying to hide from the future. Rather, they’re trying to figure out where they fit in the future PC gaming landscape.

The wild card in the deck, of course, is Oculus. Williams is predisposed to favor something like the Oculus. Before joining 777 he worked at NaturalPoint, the manufacturers of the brilliant (and woefully underrated) TrackIR.

“Head-tracking, if it didn’t save flight sims, changed the way they were played,” he explained. “Prior to TrackIR you’d have to use your mouse to look around in the cockpit, or use a padlock view [where your vision locks onto a target]. But TrackIR made the experience so much more intuitive and immersive that it just got so much easier to fly.”

View from the cockpit at a moon fading in the morning sky above the Soviet Union.

He admits, however, that the Oculus Rift is a qualitatively different experience. “There's something about putting that goggle on your face, with the screens on your eyeballs, that somehow puts you in the seat that you can't get any other way,” he said.

IL-2: Battle of Stalingrad will support TrackIR, and there’s already a build of the game that uses it. The team decided to keep it out of the ongoing IL-2 beta, though. A beta version of Oculus support, for in-progress hardware, inside a beta flight sim was just a little too much “beta” for them to be comfortable with.

“We had Oculus working internally, we did tests with it, we built support for it. But now that the Dev Kit 2s are shipping and the retail device is not too far away, then we can really sit down and make sure we implement it properly and give our users a really great experience with Oculus,” Williams said.


Ground control

On the other hand, some of 777’s moves into the future have been less well-received. Rise of Flight, as well as IL-2 and Ilya Muromets when they come out, requires an online connection to play the single-player campaign.

“Piracy was rampant in the first half of the last decade and even later on, when more DRM systems were put in. Shooters and strategy games tried to find way to better fend off piracy, and we were the first real flight sim company to say, ‘We better do something here, because if we're going to spend 3 or 4 million dollars developing a flight sim, we need to make sure that we can protect it,’” Williams said.

It’s easy to scoff at this justification, and you’ll find no shortage of developers who have take a stand against DRM and accepted piracy as a necessary cost of doing business. But the margins are a little tighter for a small-market studio like 777, and there’s something else to consider: the flight sim community may be uniquely comfortable with piracy.

The green countryside and small towns that dot the Eastern Front of World War I.

That’s not a value judgment. As a friend explained to me regarding the civil aviation sim market, it survived and thrived for years thanks to torrents. Long after games like Flight Simulator vanished from store shelves, there was a huge market in premium mods and fan updates for these older games. For devoted sim pilots, torrents often became the most convenient and reliable way to preserve their genre.

So 777 made their games dependent on a server connection, although Williams hopes they’ve also given some value back for that. In addition to randomly generated missions for every player, it’s also made it relatively easy to keep Rise of Flight up to date. He also concedes they’ve slowly stepped back from their original always-online model. Now, only the campaign really depends on the server connection. Most other game modes can happen without talking to the servers.


Returning to base

The ultimate proof of success for 777 and 1C, of course, will be how audiences receive IL-2 and Ilya Muromets. While they will likely find a home among serious combat flight sim fans (many of whom will show up to just about anything with the IL-2 name), the Williams and his colleagues have set themselves a much more ambitious task.

With a focus on easier hardware requirements, and making their next generation of games mouse-and-keyboard friendly, they are trying to return flight sims to a day when they were not just for a sim audience, but for a PC gaming audience.

It’s an interesting experiment. The people who showed up in droves to Red Baron and the Jane’s games are still out there. Now, Williams and his colleagues are about to find out if they’re ready to come back home to the cockpit.

Sign in to Commentlogin to comment
Mountain_Man avatarSQSON avatar
Mountain_Man Avatar
4 Years ago

"...the real challenge for this next generation of flight sims is to lower the barriers that chase people away from even giving the genre a chance. [...] we know that there's a market for [mouse control of airplanes]."

False. That was the premise behind Microsoft Flight which was essentially a dumbed-down version of Microsoft Flight Simulator X complete with a simple mouse control interface, and the game was a spectacular flop because it drove away the core market of hardcore flight sim enthusiasts, even though Microsoft insisted, unconvincingly, that there was still a hardcore flight simulator buried underneath the casual-friendly interface ("Simpler! Easier! More Accessible! But still hardcore! No, really!"). These guys are singing the same tune.

So Microsoft's flight simulator days came to an ignominious end while X-Plane is more successful than ever. Of course without competition, it's literally the only game in town, but since it's a labor of love for Laminar Research founder and X-Plane project lead Austin Meyer, it remains the no-compromise hardcore sim that it has always been because Meyer is not one to cut corners just because there's no competitor breathing down his neck.

SQSON Avatar
4 Years ago

As a long time simmer I think I should clear some things up.

BoS is the game that killed the I2 series. Jason Williams literally came to 1c and convinced them to cancel development on Il2; Battle of Moscow. The true successor to the Il2 series made by Il2 developers. Jason Williams is someone with no background in flight sims, someone who worked for a hardware manufacturer and saw an opportunity in buying NeoGB - a company that made a WW1 flight sim.

Under Jasons brilliant guidance, the renamed NeoGB started making DLC the likes of which that would make bethesda with their horse armor envious. He managed to milk the ww1 flight sim fans, at east the fanatic ones, for all they were worth. And in the process drove off all the hard core simmers, thanks to his complete disregard for historically accurate performance.

Now this Jason Williams is tainting the Il2 name, one of the most esteemed in all of combat flight simming, by making a game that follows the lead of Rise of Flight. One filled with micro-transactions, with little care given to historical flight performance and no care given to the machines used at stalingrad. This is a game where the 190 is given free reign over stalingrad, even though it never served there. While the iconic Ju-52, which played a vital role at stalingrad is simply absent... I think some of this has to do with what planes will sell to the "light sim" audience 777 is targeting.

For everyone who is reading about this game and might be thinking "this is a sequel to Il2" - it is not. This is a cash grab by a developer who has shown a clear disdain for its community time and time again. A developer who cares more about making 1.99 off of colored scarves rather then updating the flight models of aircraft that are clearly inaccurate (they said it was too hard to do and their engine made changing fms impossible, but they added altimeters for money!

I think this article is a case of PC world not having enough experience to properly rate something as specialized as a flight sim. They hear the BS of the developers and take it a face value, whereas the flight sims fans already know the story.

As a long time CFS (combat flight sim) and most of all, an Il2 fan, please don't buy this game. It is a disgrace to the Il2 name, a fast and cheap money grab that takes advantage of people from lighter sims, like War thunder and World of Warplanes, to make money. This is IL2 dragged through the mud, with bad physics thrown in, and microtrnasactions tossed in.

This is a game made by a man wanting money, with no love or care for aviation, let alone ww2. Dont give opportunists like this your money