Nvidia's updated EULA aims to kill GeForce data centres and cheeky cloud gaming services | PCGamesN

Nvidia's updated EULA aims to kill GeForce data centres and cheeky cloud gaming services

GeForce Now GPU stack

For some time now, data centres have been keen to find a way around Nvidia’s professional, and pricey, tiered business model. The answer? Use GeForce or Titan graphics cards instead. To prevent gamer-focused cards from making their way into big data application - and, in turn, cutting out Nvidia’s pricey Quadro and Tesla cards - Nvidia have now updated their EULA to kick big data in the rear.

Want the latest Nvidia graphics tech? Here are the best graphics cards for gaming… hey! Stop machine learning on that, right now!

Nvidia have been throwing their toys out of the pram ever since big data centre companies got word that they don’t  need to spend thousands on a single parallel processing GPU, only needing to spend a little more than the average gamer. For a little machine learning you could easily be looking to spend nearly £10,000 on a single Tesla V100 GPU - a GTX 1080 Ti, or even a Titan V with all those Volta Tensor cores, is pennies by comparison.

Unsurprisingly, Nvidia aren’t too fussed on the idea of big businesses destroying their profit margins, and have now updated their End User License Agreement (EULA) to come crashing down on data centres with the full force of the (licensing) law.

Nvidia Tesla Volta V100 GPU

The updated EULA now reads:

“No Datacenter deployment. The software is not licensed for datacenter deployment, except that blockchain processing in a datacenter is permitted.”

Good news for large-scale miners, who can still continue to use GeForce cards for their cryptocurrency ventures. Nvidia seemingly are a little wary of cutting themselves out of that market, and leaving an exceedingly large amount of money on the - albeit slightly precarious - table. Unfortunately, big data and machine learning applications have few alternatives to the parallel processing power that Nvidia can offer, at least for the time being, leaving businesses and end-users at the mercy of the green team’s will.

This new EULA only applies to the driver software and not the hardware itself. This means users that refuse the latest drivers are still free to use these cards as they wish, however, they do forego any future updates and support. Nvidia are also quick to note to CNBC that non-commercial and research uses are not affected by the changes, and may continue to utilise GeForce and Titan graphics cards.

Nvidia Titan V has been around for ages

Whether cloud gaming services, such as Blade’s Shadow streaming, will be affected by these changes is not yet clear. Blade’s Shadow servers do not use Nvidia’s GRID, and offer a single dedicated graphics card to every user on the service - a pricey approach if GeForce is no longer an option.

Nvidia have supposedly tried addressing this ‘issue’ before, at least with the large suppliers they work closely with. Nvidia were rumoured to be “strictly monitoring” server suppliers to ensure that they were not cutting Nvidia’s top-end enterprise GPUs out, instead favouring GeForce and Titan cards. These rumours even suggested that Nvidia were threatening to cut supply of GPUs to suppliers if they did not comply with their demands.

Nvidia hold a lot of sway in big data, especially after their recent stock surge. It seems the company is quite aware of the benefits which that market leading position hands them, and are in a position with machine learning and parallel processing where they aren’t afraid to throw their considerable weight around.

GOTW
Sign in to Commentlogin to comment
TsunamiWombat avatarJezcentral avatarJacob Ridley avatarQDP2 avatar
TsunamiWombat Avatar
752
5 Months ago

Is this even legally enforceable? How do you dictate to a customer what they do with your product after market?

1
Jacob Ridley Avatar
41
5 Months ago

Large companies will be very wary of breaking a EULA, regardless of whether they legally have to follow it or not. This gives Nvidia quite a bit of control over what these companies do with their products. For most everyday users, it won't have nearly as much impact.

1
Jezcentral Avatar
544
5 Months ago

One the one hand, this is an egregious abuse of market position that is unconscionably price-gouging companies who don't want to overpay for a fancy piece of over-engineering and a warranty. (I mean, what do Nvidia care what they do with it, once they've paid for it, as long as they aren't clamouring for a free replacement when one dies?)

On the other, I'm kind of relieved that gamers might still be able to get hold of gaming GPUs.

1
QDP2 Avatar
1030
5 Months ago

nVidea care because they made the Quadro series GPUs for these large data-tech companies. Heavy investments go into the research for the tech of these cards (being much further ahead of their time than any GeForce card) resulting in higher premiums to bring profits to them. With consumer cards demanding more each year (and nVidea fighting to balance against AMDs offering) the GeForce series is progressing far faster than the Quadro series, leaving a far smaller market than they need.

I completely agree with you though, this is abuse of power, forcing datacenters to pay the premium so the rest of us to get more competitive/affordable GPUs down the line. The problem is when a datacenter sets up shop, they'll need hundreds of GPUs. It's kind of hard to get an order of such magnitude past nVidea without them noticing, so it's not like they'll have a choice but to either pay the premium or take a look at the less-competitive alternatives.

Most companies will probably opt to pay the Quadro premium, as it'll be better for them in the long-run to be able to compete with other Quadro companies (and out-do those who chose AMD instead) than it would to lose shares with smaller/weaker datacenters. nVidea are profiteering out of this, nothing more. Just got to love shady business practices.

1