Longkatt's Avatar

Longkatt profile

13

Longkatt has recently been playing No Man's Sky, Mordheim: City of the Damned and SteamVR

Currently Playing
No Man's Sky icon

No Man's Sky

3 days 10 hours

SteamVR icon

SteamVR

1 day 3 hours

Most played
Spelunky icon

Spelunky

6 days 13 hours

Exanima icon

Exanima

3 days 14 hours


Longkatt Avatar
Longkatt responded to Findaer comment in
2 Years ago
Lorne Lanning on VR: a lot of developers “are in lala land”Lorne Lanning on VR: a lot of developers “are in lala land”
Findaer Avatar

Concerns like this make it seem like Oculus is right to have a curated store front. I also think the hyper enthusiasm from developers is better than a hardware maker trying to convince devs to make things for it.


That said, are most of the big names in gaming that are down on VR because of the experience with VR in the 90s? Seems like there have been a few that have popped up using that as an example lately.

Longkatt Avatar

I noticed that trend too. A lot of those developers who lived through the 90s seem to be very jaded to the VR idea. Here's hoping they're proved wrong hmm.

sign in to comment
Longkatt Avatar
Longkatt responded to huldu comment in
2 Years ago
Why one publisher sees a game you play for 1,000 hours as a missed opportunityWhy one publisher sees a game you play for 1,000 hours as a missed opportunity
huldu Avatar

I really dislike f2p games and day-1 dlc. They're both made for one purpose alone and that isn't to make a good game but to be greedy and make a lot of money. This alone isn't the problem however, making money of a game is important but it's how you do it that matters. When a player, like myself, see your greed bleed through every crack of your miserable game, why would I want to play it? F2p games need to go back under the rock they came from along with poorly excuses for dlc. Last I checked games were made and prospered just fine before f2p and dlc even existed.


This line "It’s why, along with MMOs like Tera and Aion, a genre we’ve come to expect to be free to play... etc", that might be because they're pretty bad games that would never live through a normal subscription game model. That's one big thing with mmos today, they're released to make "money" and have a ton of issues and gameplay problems stacked up. They lack a soul and that brings me back to what I said up top, you have developers making a game they love and then you have developers making games to make them money.


You'll have to excuse me, if you're reading this, the formatting just isn't working when I post comments on this site.

Longkatt Avatar

I read an interesting piece on kotaku about DLC being a good thing- basically it allows for the dev teams of large games to stay together after the development of the game is finished, rather than being laid off from the company as they can pay the salaries. Instead they allow them to make DLC until the next game is past pre-pro and can be worked on. As for day one DLC its the same thing often there is often about 9 months between a game being finished and it being released and in that time the dev team keeps making DLC. Obviously its not allways the case but I think DLC can be a very good thing towards getting better games as the dev teams are more stable and longer lasting.

sign in to comment
Longkatt Avatar
Longkatt responded to Tovias comment in
2 Years ago
What developers and Steam users think about paid mods on the Steam WorkshopWhat developers and Steam users think about paid mods on the Steam Workshop
Tovias Avatar

24 Hours refund policy. I am sure you are aware how extremely volatile is the Skyrim engine and that an update for one mod or third person aplication can easily fuck over your game. Or worse, what if a modder stops support for his mod?

Longkatt Avatar

Those are true, but as I see it shitty mods wont sell. If it breaks games then it will have problems getting good reviews and making sales or keeping them. As for "what if they stop support?" they might, and you might go out of pocket, but if its earning them money then they have a far better incentive to support it long term don't they? Better than mods do now, also they have a better incentive to make sure it dosn't break the game unlike now when people don't really worry if it runs for them.

sign in to comment
Longkatt Avatar
Longkatt responded to Matt Purslow comment in
2 Years ago
Gabe Newell: “pissing off the Internet costs you a million bucks in just a couple of days”, but the internet needs “a more robust Valve-is-evil hypothesis”Gabe Newell: “pissing off the Internet costs you a million bucks in just a couple of days”, but the internet needs “a more robust Valve-is-evil hypothesis”
Matt Purslow Avatar

Source: Robin Scott, head at SkyrimNexus http://www.nexusmods.com/games/news/12459/?


That's the split he has been informed of from Valve.

Longkatt Avatar

Your reply wasn't there when I was typing. I was only saying the 75%to valve was not true

sign in to comment
Matt Purslow Avatar
Matt Purslow responded to Longkatt's comment in
2 Years ago
Gabe Newell: “pissing off the Internet costs you a million bucks in just a couple of days”, but the internet needs “a more robust Valve-is-evil hypothesis”Gabe Newell: “pissing off the Internet costs you a million bucks in just a couple of days”, but the internet needs “a more robust Valve-is-evil hypothesis”
Longkatt Avatar

That's not even true. Bethesda have set the 75% cut as stated in all the information available, look it up. Valve are then only taking a smaller cut of that. Bearing in mind all the costs involved in making this work eg hosting, IP negotiations, its not that unfair a deal. 25% will still help feed a modder better than all the goodwill and positive community you throw at them.

Reply
Matt Purslow Avatar

Source: Robin Scott, head at SkyrimNexus http://www.nexusmods.com/games/news/12459/?


That's the split he has been informed of from Valve.

sign in to comment
Tovias Avatar
Tovias responded to Longkatt's comment in
2 Years ago
What developers and Steam users think about paid mods on the Steam WorkshopWhat developers and Steam users think about paid mods on the Steam Workshop
Longkatt Avatar

I see nothing wrong in this really. Everyone seems to be up in arms around the 25% cut however I think its actually quite good. Bearing in mind all server hosting distribution and such is handled by Valve, which is not negligible, and that there making content for non-valve games most likely incurring charges by those 3rd party publishers. Plus not all mods use only there own work, many rely on assets and such already found in game which are the property of said third party, incurring IP problems if the publisher wished. 25% is actually a very reasonable cut indeed.


The problem of stolen authorship will most likely only create fringe cases which can be delt with.


Are they refundable as if not I can see a problem with scammers or shit mods making sales before there is a good set of reviews for them.

Reply
Tovias Avatar

24 Hours refund policy. I am sure you are aware how extremely volatile is the Skyrim engine and that an update for one mod or third person aplication can easily fuck over your game. Or worse, what if a modder stops support for his mod?

sign in to comment